The Great Anthropogenic Climate Myth
Movie: Part I of III
Volcanoes VS Atmospheric CO2 As Global Heat Source

 
 
What I have just shown you is only a part of the natural chain of events listed below:

1)  Gravitational forces tilt the Earth.
2)  Changes in the Earth's tilt switch on and off the massive quantity of undersea volcanoes.
3)  Localized hot updrafts above these volcanoes produce thunderstorms.
4)  The weak coriolis force near the equator pulls strings of thunderstorms into circular rings that become the swirling mass of tropical storms.
5)  Tropical Storms produce lots of lightning as they grow into Hurricanes, Cyclones, and Typhoons.
6)  Lightning converts atmospheric heat into visible light that easily crosses the greenhouse gas barrier out into space.

 
We have not turned our Earth into a rogue planet.  Mr. Gore and our power hungry politicians reap the rewards from scaring the public into believing our polluting ways are responsible for this natural chain of events.

If you are familiar with George Orwell's book "1984": you will have no problem recognizing the "United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change" created by Mr. Gore is the direct equivalent of Orwell's lie producing "Ministry of Truth",- only Mr. Gore refers to his propaganda writers as "lead authors" instead of wordsmiths.

.

Mr. Gore did not form the UNIPCC from scratch when he was Vice President of the USA.  He just formalized a similar group he formed earlier in 1970,- of which I have first hand knowledge. His idea was to flood the infant science of Climatology and related disciplines with peer reviewed papers supporting his faulty hypothesis, effectively high-jacking the peer review system.

I remember Al Gore boasting on national television about how his battle to save the Earth would be fought and won in our nations classrooms.  It is through these dishonest curriculum changes he was able to foster his faulty hypothesis upon us, - creating generations of miseducated Phd graduates in the atmospheric sciences.  These poor grads don't have the slightest clue they've been misguided, and despite their degrees, don't know what they are talking about with respect to global warming and climate change.

.

Here is an example of a curiculum change permitting them to present lightning as a pair of elecrical currents where a second positively charged 'heavy return current' replaces the plasma discharge produced by the first current.  Despite the fact there is no such thing as positive electricity, they use this impossible return current to picture lightning as a heat source in global warming.

Historicaly Gore's first target was the consortium of international scientists who's work on the "International Geophysical Year" predates Mr. Gore's rise to power, and contradicts his notion that it was the rise in CO2 levels in our atmosphere that cause the attendant rise in temperature.

Gore had it backwards: Actually, the rise in temperature in the sea-bed due to these undersea volcanoes,- drives the CO2 trapped in the cold ocean depths out into the atmosphere as the driving heat itself leaves the ocean.  They arrive in the atmosphere at almost the same time.

Real science has always determined the heat increase precedes the rise in CO2 levels, but it is very very close, and Mr. Gore's wordsmiths have used graphic tricks to show the opposite.  In my book I have deconstructed their sneaky tricks revealing their alterations to the real truth in this matter.

Another frequent activity of these wordsmiths is to introduce disaster movies based on their version of climate change. "Hurricanes" subtitled "Rouge Planet" is a current example.  They also constantly flood the media with newscasts that twist scientific facts to support their point of view.

For example: they even admit there are huge amounts of carbon dioxide leaving our oceans by trying to scare us with the fact we can't count on our oceans to swallow up the excess CO2 we are supposedly producing.  They point out this is because only a tiny amount of CO2 is leaving our atmosphere to go into our oceans.

Here, they are counting on the fact that only a small number of people know about the "Equalibrium Exchange of Gasses at the boundary of a gas with a liquid".  If you took High Scool Chemistry, and if you haven't forgot all that stuff you crammed to pass the exam, - then you know that when only a tiny amount of gas passes through a gaseous/liquid boundary in one direction, - a huge amount of that same gas is passing through the same boundary in the opposite direction.

Actually mankind's CO2 production since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution compared to the amount of CO2 driven out of all the world's oceans over the same time period, is less than a single drop of water compared to all the water in all the world's oceans.

Our CO2 production is simply too puny to produce an excess, and we are not the cause of any kind of climate change.

These crafty wordsmiths depend on you having a short memory span.  It was their contention that our current floods would arise from the polar melt waters, - not from the sky, as I have been claiming all along.

Time has proven it is I who am right, not them.

Our current floods are from rain swelled waterways, not from rising ocean levels due to polar melt waters.  Of course the run-off from our rivers and streams, with the increased rainfall over our oceans, will eventually raise ocean levels.

However, these wordsmiths remind you they have been predicting these floods; smug in the knowledge few people care about the details,- so they can still claim the floods are the results of mankind's polluting ways.

This gives the UNIPCC the power to scare the world's signatory governments into implimenting a carbon tax,- spelling the death of any form of democracy.

In what nation, where and when, at any level of government, - did any member of the general public ever vote for a carbon tax?

Be careful about endorsing a "One World Government" as you may end up with a "One World Dictatorship".  The dictator who orchestrates our opinions is still a dictator.

One of the most troubling and unscientific statements comming from the so-called scientists at the UNIPCC is: "All the science regarding Climate Change has already been done."   Nothing could be further from the truth!  Coupled with their political push for action on climate change in Canada's 2019 election,- they hope to crush further research into the real causes of climate change, such as the accurate measurement of the amount of CO2 being released from the cold ocean depths into the atmosphere.  I have provided qualitative evidence this is massive, and they desparately want to prevent real science from proving this with real unquestionable quantitative data.

While they have no qualms about inventing facts and figures to support their claims, real science must always provide true and accurate independantly verifiable facts and figures.  They know this, which is why they claim to be real scientists, backing eachother up from the same establishment as though they were independent from eachother while they continue to ignore the scientific method.  In reality, these people are nothing more than a bunch of pseudoscientific politicians with an agenda most honest people would choose to avoid.  Here they often confuse the public by hiring real scientists who can attest to the effects of Climate Change but who's disciplines are not responsible for researching the causes of climate change.  Below is an example of the devious lengths they have resorted to in altering our knowledge of the capacitive behaviour of the greenhouse gasses by showing capacitors being supposedly charged up to a voltage higher than the voltage of the power supply that is charging them.

I wasted most of 2015 and 2016 producing a segment of this movie on "capacitors" and their behaviour,- as the greenhouse gasses turn our globe's atmosphere into a heat capacitor.  Placing phony 'limits' in their Calculus expressions, a branch of mathematics most people avoid, Mr. Gore's wordsmiths were able to claim the impossible: an electrical capacitor can be charged to a value that exceeds the value of its power supply, and by extension, so can a heat capacitor.  This is like saying a bath tub can be filled with water beyond its brim.

You can pour more water into the tub, but it will just spill over onto the floor.

I was able to demonstrate how the heat spillage of our greenhouse gas capacitor simply prolonged the heating periods of our globe.  I also could show the times where this happened in our 2.5 million year climate history.

.

Here I used our superior long term climate history as determined by the oxygen isotope record taken from the seabed during the International Geophysical Year.  Follow this link for a complete comparison of the strengths and weaknesses of both the Seabed and the Ice Core methods of Oxygen Isotope Climate Analysis,- and how I combined their data into a better single climate record.

I was not able to charge any of my demonstration capacitors to a voltage level higher than the voltage of my power supply,- just as nobody can fill a bath tub beyond its brim.

However, (especially for those who did not follow the above link) if I add a second hidden power supply capable of producing higher voltages than my visible power supply,- I can make my test capacitors charge to a higher value than my visible power supply.  Here the capacitors would really be charged up to the voltage of my hidden power supply, - making it appear they were being charged up to a voltage higher than their only power supply.  A deeper bath tub mounted on the same floor would have a higher brim, but would be difficult to hide in he same bathroom.

.

Enter the undersea volcanoes.  Unlike the sun, they heat the globe day and night, and as I have just shown you,- are all over the place.  Mr. Gore et all, are blaming you for both the heat and the CO2 these volcanoes produce.

Before moving on to the "Astronomical Connection" where I explain the two separate causes for the Earth's changes in tilt, and which of these switches on and off our volcanic activity.  I shall demonstrate how lightning is created by thunderstorms, and how this plasma converts heat energy into light that has no trouble passing through Mr. Gore's precious greenhouse gas barrier out into space.  As worked out in Appendix VI  pages 165 to 192 of my book: This converts from a minimum of 20% to a maximum of 65% of the amount of global warming taking place every second,- into energy that is expelled from the Earth for good.

 
The most important facts to remember about Climate Change are:

1)  The Earth has two heat sources not just one, as Al Gore and the UNIPCC want you to believe so they can blame you for the heat and CO2 produced by the second source.
2)  There is no such thing as man produced rapid climate change, - so you are not guilty as charged by Al Gore and the UNIPCC.
3)  The Earth is not in danger from any kind of normal climate change, as it has a mechanism to expell excess heat through the greenhouse gas barrier.
4)  Normal Climate Change is natural, slow, continuously cyclical, and subject to our Astronomical environment.
5)  A supervolcanic eruption such as Toba's YTT eruption in Sumatra, Indonesia 75,000 years ago can bring about abnormal world wide devastating climate change for centuries to come.
6)  There are two supervolcanoes in the continental USA that are both showing signs of unrest.
7)  A large astroid or comet strike such as the one that made the Chicxulub crater in the Yucatan Peninsula 65 Million years ago can also bring about abnormal world wide devastating climate change for centuries to come.

 
More than once I have looked into a pair of fear glazed eyes gazing back searchingly into my own, as their owner realized I was telling the truth that we cannot fight climate change.  There is simply so much more CO2 and direct heat coming from the smouldering 85 million undersea volcanoes than there is from the 4 volcanic complexes just south of the Azores.

Here we are comparing the CO2 and direct heat output from 85 Million volcanoes with the same from only 4 volcanoes, not 40, nor 400, not 4,000 nor 40,000, not 400,000 or even 4,000,000 - just 4

Fear Not.

Our prehistoric ancestors survived many previous glacial retreats by migrating to other parts of the world that benefited from the warmer climes.  Our modern technologies give us a previously unheard of advantage:  Adjust your thermostat.

As for Mr. Gore's nostalgic sighs over an idealistic country scene: Such scenes will still be around for centuries to come.  Better yet, our distant offspring may experience wonders of nature we can't even imagine, that are far better than anything we hope to preserve for them.

Where are we now?  Approaching the peak heat of our current glacial retreat, which we should reach in about 2,000 years.  At our current 0.03OC per century rate of increase, our temperature will have been increased by 6.0OC.  Beyond that, our glacial retreat will cool down for another 20,000 years before the next glacial advance begins.

Back