To discourage this type of rebellion the Peruvian Government may find it advantageous to deny Inca History and anyone associated with it.

All the errors in the modern era treat the Incas as though they were Native Americans like the peoples they ruled, making them ruling members of either the Aymara, or the Queshua. They were not ruling members of either people, they were a separate group of people from another race.

Scholars all over the world have been aware of both Garcilaso de la Vega and Pedro de Cieza de León for centuries, just as they have been aware of the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus who wrote about the fall of Jerusalem in Palestine in the year AD 70. These authors, and indeed Pizarro himself contradict the entries made in modern encyclopedias regarding the Incas and the Native Americans ruled by the Incas. Below I shall reveal the contradictions:

An unsigned entry for Peru in Encarta 95 says "Not much is known about Peruvian History prior to the 16th century."