137

Final Analysis

One thing that has nagged at me continuously ever since I started to write this book while watching Al Gore's suave presentation; was the way in which he often taunts real scientists by displaying a knowledge of the real truth while denying that truth with his fabrication.   For example:

When he talked about continental drift he used his grade school classmate's observation to introduce the subject of how the continents of Africa and South America once fit together -without ever mentioning the spreading of the seafloor that pushed these continents apart.  It is a well established scientific fact that this spreading of the seafloor was produced by the Mid Atlantic Ridge's undersea volcanoes.  His hypothetical man produced warming fabrication has no place for the heat and greenhouse gases released from the ocean due to these volcanoes.

This leads me to believe that Mr. Gore and his UNIPCC cohorts know the real truth but want us to believe their lie. The question is Why?

The notion that Al Gore and the IPCC know the real truth about global warming yet persist in propagating their lie, haunts me, and explains why for example; a vice president of a superpower would waist time convincing the world to cut down on greenhouse gases if the flooding from global warming were anywhere near as imminent as he claims.  One would think his time and efforts would be better spent organizing flood control projects or warning people to move away from the danger zones like the Chinese Government's warnings to its people regarding the deliberate flooding of the Yangtze River Basin.

No.  They would rather frighten signatory governments into handing over their sovereignty by demanding taxes without representation from the world's population at Copenhagen where they had the gall to ask each signatory nation for Billions of dollars to fight global warming.

I believe the answer has nothing to do with saving the Earth from man produced climate change but rather from their desire to bring about a One World Government with themselves at the helm.   Their fake version of global warming is nothing more than a common enemy they seek to use to unite the world against a perceived common threat.

The UNIPCC or United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's very name is much more political than scientific.  It also demonstrates a first step towards establishing a one world government by the creation of an intergovernmental authority on a matter other than peace keeping.  Science does not decide on scientific facts by the

138

consensus of opinion determined by the work of intergovernmental panels or any other sort of panel.   Scientific facts are very rare as they depend on our observations of nature itself, and as our methods of observation become increasingly more sophisticated our scientific facts require modification.

Ah but the UNIPCC is a panel of scientists.  I doubt it.  Real scientists know their determinations must come from observations of nature, not from their own agreed upon understanding of nature, written in stone.  When nature disagrees, real scientists learn more, and grow in their understanding.  Ian Plimer mentions in his book “Heaven and Earth” the IPCC claims to have 2500 scientists on the panel.  He claims most of them are political activists from Green movements that don’t have any real scientific training.

I would not be surprised if I were to learn some time down the road that the few real scientists at the University of East Anglia who were involved in Climategate 2009 also served on the PhD committees of a great many of those political activists, and that they were handing out PhD degrees in the “Atmospheric Sciences” to those activists like the prizes found in Cracker Jack boxes (boxes of caramelized popcorn) when I was a child.

The perceived common threat is the massive flooding they predict will result from man produced rapid global warming.  Well, by now you know that mankind is not responsible for global warming, and that the drastic rise in sea levels may have already reached their full height, or if they will still rise by any significant amount, it will take many thousands of years for that rise to take place.  The exorbitant sums they demand to fight their version of global warming places such a heavy financial burden on many nations that the world’s economic condition has deteriorated.  Of course Mr. Gore’s world controlling friends are ready to take over through the auspices of the International Monetary Fund, IMF, with its stable gold based reserves.  I see this “one – two” punch to the current world organization as another step in the deliberate attempt to bring about a One World Government.

I think Ian Plimer is too harsh on the Christian Evangelicals who take the Bible literally.  At least they have not been taken in by the IPCC and Al Gore regarding the massive flooding because God placed a rainbow in the sky to remind them God would never destroy mankind by another massive flood.  They also have St. John the Divine’s warning about a giant comet called “Wormwood” in the biblical Book of Revelation.

Thus the Christian Evangelicals have a better understanding of what to expect from what the science in this book is telling us than Al Gore’s religious followers will ever gain by following Al Gore and the UNIPCC’s version of global warming.  The science in this book agrees with the evangelicals in that the threat from space is much more deadly and real than the threat of global flooding from the polar melt waters.  Finally, anyone who thinks a One World Government born in and through such deceit is a good thing, is simply not well.  Well people do not knowingly hand over control of their lives to such monsters.